Friday 24 June 2016

EU Trademarks: CJEU obliges EUIPO to accept staggered partial renewal requests

In its judgment in case C-207/15 P, published on 22 June 2016, the CJEU found in favour of Nissan Jidosha KK and against the EUIPO in ex parte proceedings relating to the possibility of renewing an EU trademark in two stages.

Nissan had requested, within the six months preceding the due date, the partial renewal, in two classes, of a trademark registered in three. Subsequently, within the six-month grace period after the due date, the registrant submitted a further request for renewal in the remaining class, which the Office turned down.

Why was that? According to the EUIPO, the request for partial renewal in just two of the three classes in which the trademark had been granted registration entailed the surrender of the third class. The Office also maintained that reasons of legal certainty entered into play, given that the partial renewal in two classes had already been entered on the records, Nissan had been notified thereof, erga omnes effects had consequently been created and Nissan could therefore not be allowed to go back on its initial decision not to renew the trademark in the third class.

The EUIPO thus interpreted article 50 (relating to surrender) broadly and article 47 (relating to renewal) narrowly, contrary to the interests of Nissan in both cases.

However, in its judgment the CJEU has held that “it is not apparent from those provisions that the submission, during the periods referred to in Article 47(3) of Regulation No 207/2009, of requests for renewal of an EU trade mark, staggered over time and relating to different classes of goods or services, is prohibited”.

It seems strange that both the EUIPO and the General Court should have interpreted those provisions in a manner adverse to the interests of the trademark owner, rather than in favour thereof, when the controversy arose out of a gap in the regulations and the registrant and its representative acted entirely within the bounds of the law (at least according to the German, Portuguese, Finnish and Dutch language versions of article 47.3)

It is also rather surprising that the EUIPO should have come out so strongly in defence of legal certainty when we all know perfectly well that there is a six-month grace period for the renewal of an EU trademark and, therefore, that one should never assume that the registration may have lapsed until that term has expired. It appears to us that we should be equally cautious and draw no conclusions until after the expiry of that term in cases where the registration has been renewed but only partially.

We all look for legal certainty, but in doing so we ought to be consistent. From this standpoint, to deny a trademark owner the right to renew a registration in two stages, while the grace period is still running, would not seem logical when, in contrast, insufficient attention is paid to the need to keep the information on the status of the trademarks in the EUIPO databases current. On occasions updates are subject to delays of some months and this circumstance evidently generates uncertainty.

Visit our website:        


  1. This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your fantastic post. Also, I Have shared your website in my social networks!

  2. Great goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely fantastic. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart. I cant wait to read far more from you. This is really a great site.

  3. Hey There. I found your weblog using msn. This is an extremely smartly written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and return to learn extra of your helpful information. Thanks for the post.
    I’ll certainly return.

  4. Excellent article. Very interesting to read. I really love to read such a nice article. Thanks! keep rocking. 사설토토

  5. Amazing post written. It shows your effort and dedication. Thanks for sharing such a nice post. 토토


  6. Hi, Thank you so much for sharing this important information from us. Your content is awesome, I'm very happy after read it. 바카라사이트

  7. I applaud you giving the information that you have proceed you're outstanding effort! Appreciate on promoting. I welcome you to look around my website to learn more.
    ley de divorcio de nueva jersey

  8. The nuances you discuss regarding the registration process, renewal, and potential challenges offer a comprehensive understanding of the intricacies involved.In a similar vein, crafting an mba dissertation proposal demands a similar level of meticulousness. Just as you delve into the complexities of EU trademarks, an mba dissertation proposal requires thorough research, strategic planning, and a clear outline to pave the way for a successful research journey.

  9. Dissertation Help Never Sleeps Enjoy the assurance of 24/7 support; British assignment help is your unwavering companion, ready to assist and guide you at any hour.

  10. Fascinating insight into the recent CJEU judgment! New Jersey Domestic Violence Registry It's great to see legal nuances explained so clearly. Kudos to the blog for shedding light on the complexities of trademark renewal and challenging interpretations. The thorough analysis highlights the importance of consistency in safeguarding trademark owners' rights and the need for ongoing database accuracy. District Of New Jersey Local Rules Protective Order