Friday 1 July 2016

Damages in cases of EU trademark application infringement

In the main proceedings from which the questions referred to the CJEU stem (judgment of 22 June 2016, C-280/15), the plaintiff –the holder of an EU trademark- filed a complaint for unlawful use of her trademark as a “hidden keyword” on an Internet websiteThe use in question had allegedly commenced prior to the publication of the plaintiff’s trademark application and had continued after publication of the registration of the mark.   

The plaintiff sought three orders, namely: (i) a declaration of infringement of her trademark; (ii) compensation for the advantage improperly obtained by means of the infringement, calculated by multiplying the duration of the infringement by the fee established in the licensing agreement; and (iii) compensation for the moral damages suffered on account of the infringement.

The relief sought by the plaintiff gave rise to some uncertainty, and so the court decided to refer the following three questions to the CJEU:


  • First of all, the referring court asked whether Art. 102.1 EUTMR must be interpreted as meaning that an EU Trademark Court must issue an order which prohibits a third party from proceeding with acts of trademark infringement even though the trademark holder did not apply to the court for such an order.       

   
In reply to that question, the CJEU stated that Art. 102.1 EUTMR does not preclude an EU Trademark Court from refraining, pursuant to certain principles of national procedural law, from issuing an order which prohibits a third party from proceeding with acts of infringement on the grounds that the trademark holder concerned has not applied for such an order before that court.


  • The referring court’s second and third questions concern the second sentence of Art. 9.3 EUTMR on compensations and specifically question the following two aspects: 
(i) Whether the holder of an EU trademark may claim compensation in respect of acts of third parties occurring before publication of the application for registration of the trademark concerned; and 
(ii)Whether, in the case of acts occurring after publication of the application for registration of that mark, but before publication of the registration, the concept of “reasonable compensation” in that provision means damages intended to compensate for all the harm suffered by that holder, i.e., recovery of the usual value derived by the third party from use of the mark and compensation for the moral damages suffered. 
The answer to the first question is clear: the second sentence of Art. 9.3 EUTMR establishes a strictly circumscribed exception to the rule that an EU trademark cannot prevail against third parties prior to the publication of its registration (Art. 9.3, first sentence). Therefore, no compensation can be demanded for acts that take place prior to the publication of the application for registration of the trademark.  

In order to reply to the second question, the CJEU makes an interpretation of the concept of “reasonable compensation”, based on the following points:


  • The rights conferred by an application for registration of an EU trademark are conditional in nature, since at that point there is no certainty that the mark applied for will be granted.                                                       
  • It thus follows that the reasonable compensation that may be claimed in an action based on a trademark application must be smaller in scope than the damages that may be claimed by the holder of a registered trademark. 
  • Furthermore, a distinction is drawn in Art. 96 EUTMR between the actions in each case, i.e., (a) refers to any infringement action, whilst (b) refers to any action brought as a result of acts referred to in Art. 9.3, second sentence, EUTMR.  
  • Also, Art. 13 of Directive 2004/48 establishes rules on the subject of damages which, on the one hand, provide for full compensation for the harm suffered, which may include moral damages, in the event of acts of infringement committed knowingly and, on the other, recovery of profits or the payment of damages which may be pre-established where the acts of infringement have not been committed knowingly. 
All this confirms that the “reasonable compensation” provided under Art. 9.3, second sentence, EUTMR must be smaller in scope than the damages that can be claimed by the holder of an EU trademark for acts of infringement committed after the registration of the trademark, and must be limited to the recovery of profits actually derived by third-party infringers from use of the mark during that period, with moral damages being ruled out.  

In light of the above points, the CJEU replied to the referring court’s questions as follows:

1)      Article 102(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark must be interpreted as not precluding an EU trade mark court from refraining, pursuant to certain principles of national procedural law, from issuing an order which prohibits a third party from proceeding with acts of infringement on the ground that the proprietor of the trade mark concerned has not applied for such an order before that court.
2)      The second sentence of Article 9(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 must be interpreted as precluding the proprietor of an EU trade mark from being able to claim compensation in respect of acts of third parties occurring before publication of an application for registration of a trade mark.  In the case of acts of third parties committed during the period after publication of the application for registration of the mark concerned but before publication of its registration, the concept of ‘reasonable compensation’ in that provision refers to recovery of the profits actually derived by third parties from use of the mark during that period.  On the other hand, that concept of ‘reasonable compensation’ rules out compensation for the wider harm which the proprietor of the mark may have suffered, including, as the case may be, moral prejudice.

Author: Ana Sanz

Visit our website: http://www.elzaburu.es/en    

26 comments:

  1. Yes, unlawful use of the trademark is an illegal act. So I suggest business owner to buy registered trademark for your business. I also got a problem with my competitor for a trademark but I have registered my product so that I won the case.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Any celebration this is adversely laid low with a decision of the euipo forums of Make My Assignment attraction may additionally carry an action before the european widespread court docket within months of notification of the contested selection. A choice of the ecu standard court docket can be appealed to the european courtroom of justice.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have such amazing Lay outs. Thank you very much for this excellent information.!!! I really appreciated.

    토토
    바카라사이트
    파워볼
    카지노사이트

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very good blog. with lots of useful information. I would love to read your blog. I will regularly read your blog.

    토토
    스포츠토토
    토토사이트
    먹튀검증

    ReplyDelete
  5. Amazing. You are dependably a motivation. you generally make an impact on your blog with new posts!

    스포츠토토
    온라인카지노
    파워볼사이트
    온라인바카라

    ReplyDelete
  6. 바카라사이트 Hello friends, pleasant paragraph and nice arguments commented at this place, I am actually enjoying by these.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello there, You’ve done an incredible job. I will definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I’m confident they’ll be benefited from this website.|
    스포츠토토

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi there, You have done a great job. I will definitely digg it and
    personally recommend to my friends. I am confident they will be benefited from this web site.
    토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  9. 토토 I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You’ve ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Amazed to be here and want to read this amazing info. Thanks for this interesting article and i would really want to say thanks for this info. 토토

    ReplyDelete
  11. A much informative article and I really appreciate this info and willing for the more interesting article like this. 온라인카지노

    ReplyDelete
  12. Can nicely write on similar topics! Welcome to here you'll find out how it should look. Valuable information. 카지노

    ReplyDelete
  13. However when it comes to promoting your business, postcards certainly don’t show their age next to their contemporaries: the text message and the email. 토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  14. my iPhone and it looks a ton different than on my computer have you noticed this or is it just my phone ? 토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  15. I have noticed this weblog. Lastly 토토사이트 something not a junk, which we undergo incredibly frequently.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I have to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in penning this blog. I’m hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts by you later on as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my own blog now 국산야동

    Also feel free to visit may webpage check this link
    야설

    ReplyDelete
  17. Really it was an awesome article...very interesting to read. Please sharing like this information. 사설토토

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thanks for sharing this brilliant article it was a very useful and helpful article. 파워볼게임

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hi there, 토토사이트 I found your blog by the use of Google while looking for a related subject,
    your site came up, it appears good. I've bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 스포츠중계 Аs tҺe аdmin oof this site іs աorking, no uncertainty very shօrtly іt will be well-known, due to its feature contents.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I have seen good contents.
    The content on your site is great. I am impressed. 바카라사이트

    ReplyDelete
  22. wow, its a incredible information. thanks for sharing. i think this article would be nice if you put some image to help describing the topic. Feel free to visit my website; 토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  23. beth dutton purse, I received an email inviting me to leave a review. It's refreshing to see a company that genuinely cares about their customers' opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Your blogs are really good and interesting. It is very great and informative. The use in question had allegedly commenced prior to the publication of the plaintiff’s trademark application and had continued after publication of the registration of the mark Bankruptcy lawyers in virginia. I got a lots of useful information in your blog. Keeps sharing more useful blogs..

    ReplyDelete
  25. Thank you for breaking down the complexities of damages in EU trademark cases! Your post clarifies a lot of questions I had. Have you encountered any notable cases where the determination of damages played a pivotal role in shaping trademark law?
    Abogados de divorcio sin oposición Virginia Beach

    ReplyDelete