All of us will be familiar with the famous puzzle
invented in 1974 by Erno Rubik. The cube has a core mechanism with intersecting
axes allowing each of the six faces to rotate independently, thus giving shape
to a six-colour puzzle.
Given the worldwide success it rapidly achieved, the puzzle inevitably inspired the appearance in the marketplace in the course of the years of a multitude of other models made of various materials and in a range of shapes and colours.
Given the worldwide success it rapidly achieved, the puzzle inevitably inspired the appearance in the marketplace in the course of the years of a multitude of other models made of various materials and in a range of shapes and colours.
In
these circumstances appropriate protection naturally had to be sought for the
Rubik’s Cube and was obtained through intellectual property rights such as
those afforded by EU trademark No. 162784.
![]() |
EU trademark No. 162784, the mark in dispute |
A conflict arose in connection with that trademark in
2006, when a famous German toy manufacturer filed an application for a
declaration of invalidity on the ground, essentially, that the mark embodied a
technical function consisting of the rotatable nature of the product and that
third parties were thus prevented from selling similar puzzles which
necessarily incorporated that mechanism and took a shape essential for the
proper functioning thereof.
Up to now the EUIPO and the General Court had
maintained that the representation of the Rubik’s Cube with its grid structure
had sufficient distinctive character to perform the function of a trademark and
that the internal mechanism could not, in any event, be perceived therein.
However, in a judgment published on 10 November 2016 (C-30/15 P) the Court of Justice has overturned those previous rulings.
In that judgment, which is in line with the
conclusions previously drawn by the Advocate General, the Court holds that
the essential characteristics of a shape must be assessed in the light of the
technical function of the actual goods at issue (a three-dimensional
puzzle), also taking into account the elements which are not visible in the
graphic representation of that shape and the rotatability of the individual
elements of a three-dimensional puzzle of the Rubik’s Cube type. Thus, for want
of arbitrary or decorative elements, the shape of the Rubik’s Cube does not
qualify for registration as a trademark, as such a registration severely limits
the freedom of other traders to market products characterized by the same or a
similar technical result, i.e., that of a three-dimensional puzzle to be
resolved through positioning moveable elements in a logical order.
Now the EUIPO will have to deliver a fresh decision
taking into account the findings of the Court of Justice.
N.B. A Spanish version of this article was published in the economic newspaper Expansión
Author: Soledad Bernal Montes
Author: Soledad Bernal Montes
Visit our website: http://www.elzaburu.es/en
I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.This is extremely helpful info!! Very good work. Everything is very interesting to learn and easy to understood. Thank you for giving information.visit my site thesis writing service
ReplyDeleteIt is nice to read such high-quality content as computer science essay .
ReplyDeleteHey there! If you see that you need any writing help then you can apply to the essay writing service. That's the best solution to the unfinished writings! I found there help and buy a motivation letter for scholarship
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteVery Helpful Article. โป๊กเกอร์ It might help you. โป๊กเกอร์ Thanks For Sharing
โป๊กเกอร์ Thank you very much.
This Is Really Useful And Nice Information. โป๊กเกอร์
ReplyDeleteThis are such great articles. โป๊กเกอร์ This articles can help you to make some new ideas.
โป๊กเกอร์ I appreciate for reading my blogs.
This are new articles style for you. โป๊กเกอร์ You can find some new idea on this. โป๊กเกอร์ It might help you to write or think some new idea.
ReplyDeleteโป๊กเกอร์ Thanks for sharing such a wonderful post.
โป๊กเกอร์ I am very glad for reading my articles.
For providing us really effective information related to a domestic issue, I like your blog. Car insurance is a better option and I will utilize it. Dissertation Writing Service
ReplyDeleteThe information is new for me. As for a researcher, I will bookmark it. I work at the company https://topwritingservice.com/buy-a-case-brief/ as an editor. Sometimes I deal with unknown topic. It is very important for me to develop myself and read new information.
ReplyDeleteI love your content and the lessons you share with your readers. Every time I read a post, upcoming wapda jobs best forum I feel like I am able to take advantage of this post,
ReplyDelete