The Administrative Council of the European Patent Office (EPO) has removed the obstacle to performing further searches for applications in the European regional phase (Euro-PCT applications) where an objection is raised on grounds of lack of unity of invention.
Under the current wording of Rules 164 and 135 of the Implementing Regulations to the EPC, where an application in the European regional phase is deemed not to comply with the unity of invention requirement, the EPO may only conduct a search on the invention appearing first in the claim set; no additional searches may be performed for any other inventions in the set. Since patent applications may not contain subject matter that has not undergone a search, up to now the only option for applicants interested in claiming such unsearched subject matter has been to file divisional applications, with the additional cost this entails. The costs attaching to filing a divisional application include paying anew all the official fees already paid previously for the parent application, including all the cumulative annuities, which can sometimes be considerable.
Rule 164 EPC is to be amended to allow additional searches where the EPO raises objections against the unity of invention of regional phase applications. The EPO will conduct a search on the first invention appearing in the claim set and will invite the applicant to pay further search fees for any other unsearched inventions within a two-month time limit.
The amended wording of these Rules will take effect on 1 November 2014.
Author: Ruth Sánchez
Visit our website: http://www.elzaburu.es/
the European regional phase is deemed not to comply with the unity of invention requirement, the EPO may only conduct a search on the invention appearing first in the claim set; no additional searches may be performed for any other inventions in the set. Since patent applications may not contain subject matter that has not undergone a search, up to now the only option for applicants interested in claiming such unsearched subject matter has been to file divisional applications, with the additional cost this entails bankruptcy office near me.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteInteresting update from the EPO! Allowing Union County reckless driving lawyer||How Much Does A Divorce Cost in New York State searches on multiple inventions in one application seems like a game-changer for innovation. Looking forward to seeing how this streamlines the patent process!
Great update on innovation and patents! In my work with web design services in Dubai, I see how presenting ideas online effectively is just as important as protecting them.
ReplyDeleteI was panicking when I learned the EPO now carries out searches on more than one invention in a single application. It means extra fees and more complicated paperwork, and I had no clue how to handle it. Thankfully, I found the Calculate GPA uk Service and they took care of my academic calculations while I dealt with this patent headache. At least one less thing to worry about.
ReplyDeleteThat update from the EPO back in 2013 always felt like a small but important shift, because allowing searches on more than one invention in a single application made the whole process feel a bit more practical and fair for inventors who think in connected ideas instead of neat boxes. It showed they were trying to adapt to how innovation really works, not just how paperwork wants it to work. Funny how policy changes like that can quietly shape entire industries over time, kind of like how people slowly figure out what really matters when choosing the best martial arts schools columbia and stick with what proves useful in the long run.
ReplyDelete