In its judgment of 16 July 2015 (Case C-580/13) the Court of
Justice of the European Union (CJEU) placed limits on national laws protecting
banking secrecy. In response to a request from Germany's Bundesgerichtshof
(Federal Court of Justice) for a preliminary ruling on whether Germany's
national banking secrecy law contravened Directive 2004/48/EC on the
enforcement of intellectual property rights, the CJEU held that the Directive
precluded a national provision which allows, in an unlimited and unconditional
manner, a banking institution to invoke banking secrecy in order to refuse to
provide the judicial authorities with information concerning the name and
address of an account holder in the framework of proceedings dealing with the
infringement of an intellectual property right.
In 2011 Coty Germany, exclusive licensees to the Community
trademark for Davidoff Hot Water, purchased a bottle of perfume bearing that
mark from an Internet auction platform and paid the purchase price into the
seller's bank account with Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg. On observing that the
perfume was counterfeit, Coty Germany asked the auction platform for the real
name of the holder of the account from which the perfume had been sold under an
assumed name. The party in question admitted to being the account holder but
denied having sold the perfume and refused to furnish any additional
information, relying on her right not to give evidence.
Coty Germany then asked the bank, Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg,
to furnish the name and address of the holder of the bank account in which it
had deposited the purchase price for the counterfeit perfume, but the bank
refused to do so, invoking banking secrecy.
Coty Germany therefore instituted civil proceedings with the
Landgericht Magdeburg (Regional Court, Magdeburg), which ordered the
Stadtsparkasse to supply the information requested. This order was overturned
by the Oberlandesgericht Naumburg (Higher Regional Court, Naumburg), ruling
that under German civil law the bank was entitled to refuse to give evidence in
civil proceedings. Coty Germany appealed this decision to the Bundesgerichtshof
(Federal Court of Justice), which stayed the proceedings and referred a
question to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling.
The question highlights the need to reconcile the right to
an effective remedy and the right to intellectual property, on the one hand,
and the right to protection of personal data, on the other.
Essentially the CJEU has held that, taken in isolation, the
provision of national law that allows unlimited refusal by a banking
institution to furnish information concerning the name and address of an
account holder who engages in activities infringing an intellectual property
right, inasmuch as the wording of the provision contains no condition or
qualification, is liable to frustrate the fundamental right to an effective
remedy and the fundamental right to intellectual property by preventing the
competent national authorities from ordering the release of personal data
pursuant to Article 8.1 of the above-mentioned Directive.
This ruling furnishes explicit support for national laws
ensuring a fair balance between the different fundamental rights in question
and clearly places limits on banking secrecy in investigations of cases of
infringement of intellectual property rights. Given the invisibility available
to sellers of counterfeit goods on the Internet, identifying the holder of the
bank account into which payments are made can be critically important – in many
cases the only way to uncover an infringer. The CJEU's ruling can be expected
to have greater impact on civil matters in Spain, since it limits the banking
secrecy that can be invoked in civil proceedings, and less on criminal matters,
in which examining judges already enjoy broad powers to investigate crimes and
set aside fundamental rights. In any case, the ruling is a big step forward in
being able to combat the runaway scourge of sales of counterfeit branded goods
on the Internet.
Author: Juan José Caselles
Visit our website: http://www.elzaburu.es/en
google 3537
ReplyDeletegoogle 3538
google 3539
google 3540
google 3541
Intellectual Property Information is a crucial resource, providing the legal and strategic foundation for safeguarding creative and innovative endeavors, ensuring the protection of ideas in the dynamic landscape of intellectual property.Lawyers in new york||Lawyers in new jersey
ReplyDelete